Bayer stops MIC production

A news article mentions the following:
"In a surprise move in U.S. District Court in Charleston, attorneys for Bayer CropScience announced they were dropping plans to resume production of the chemical, commonly called MIC, and would begin dismantling the unit.
That ends the key part of the latest lawsuit in a nearly three-decade battle.But Bayer's decision erases a threat that loomed over the people of Institute for a generation.
The company will no doubt replace MIC, which is used to make a pesticide, with some other chemical, but nothing could be as bad, said Oden, a retired biology professor at West Virginia State University who still lives next to the plant."Chemicals don't have to kill," she said.
"There were so many questions that weren't answered," she said. "And I know there' no such thing as foolproof, because look at the situation in Japan. There's no safe, foolproof ways for doing most of what we do."
A 2008 accident that killed two workers and sent projectiles dangerously close to an aboveground MIC storage tank brought new scrutiny from Congress and the U.S. Chemical Safety Board.
The explosion also showed larger, more affluent communities in the Kanawha Valley that they too could be in danger — towns that the folks in Institute can't help but notice are whiter. In all, some 300,000 people live in the 25-mile MIC "vulnerability zone," which includes the state capital.
MIC is a colorless chemical used to make pesticides, polyurethane foam and plastics. It attacks the respiratory system, and at low levels, can irritate the eyes and throat. High concentrations can cause serious lung damage, hemorrhaging and death.
Several companies manufacture it, but the Institute plant is the only one in the nation that still stores it in large quantities.
Bayer has said it spent $36 million to improve safety and upgrade equipment, and that it slashed its MIC stockpile by 80 percent and eliminated all aboveground storage. How long it will take to exhaust the remaining supply and rid Institute of MIC entirely was not immediately clear.
Less than two years after Bhopal, Congress passed the federal Right-to-Know Act, to help the thousands of people around the country who live in the shadow of industry know what chemicals are made and stored in their neighborhoods. But that openness began to diminish after the terrorist attacks of 2001. Chemical plants became viewed as potential targets. Reports on the toxic inventory of industries were no longer as readily available to the public.

Read the full article in this link