Having investigated numerous process incidents over my 30 year career, I have come to some mundane conclusions which I am sure everybody knows...
1. No amount of management systems can prevent an incident unless the top management (leadership) send the correct signals!
2. Process safety is understood by the operations and maintenance departments but not understood by the Human Resources (HR) department!The HR department should play an important role in understanding competencies, skills and training required for Process Safety. But in many organisations, the HR department does not really understand the requirements of process safety. However, in one organization, I did see a very responsive HR department - its head was an ex-operations man!
3. Last, but not the least, Money makes the World go around! Without allocating adequate resources, audit findings, HAZOP reports recommendations, LOPA recommendations, incident investigation recommendations - all of them are meaningless and remain on paper till a catastrophic incident happens.
The BP oil spill has instilled great fear among Oil and Gas companies who fear that the regulations will be tightened very much and they need to spend a lot of resources.
Meanwhile, new management systems keep on coming, companies keep getting certified and accidents continue to occur......
Stay tuned!
PS: I am not a Pessimist!
June 3, 2010
Understand the hazards of chemicals!
Two students in the USA were reported to be in critical condition early Wednesday after being burned by a chemical explosion.Investigators with the Atlanta Fire Department confirm the students were mixing chemicals for "recreation" and not as part of a legitimate class project. They describe the explosion was an accident.In your lab, are your personnel aware of the hazards of all the chemicals they use? I heard of an incident where a lab technician in a plant (the Lab was located in the control room building) was taking a bottle of solvent and using the lift (elevator) when he accidentally dropped the bottle. The solvent went down the elevators floor and collected in the well. A spark ignited the solvent and the person had to be rescued from the elevator.
Read the article about the students in this link
Read the article about the students in this link
Transportation emergencies and GIS
I know in India, that the Andhra Pradesh Government is using the Geographical Information System (GIS) for disaster management. I read a paper on "Assessment on the Consequences of LPG Release Accident in the Road Transportation via GIS Approaches". The authors have suggested integrating the results from consequence analysis to GIS tools, to get an accurate picture for disaster management. The advantage of this method is that the point of accident can be moved to any location using the GIS and a new result will be displayed for the LPG accident at the new location.
Read the full article in this link
Read the full article in this link
Labels:
Emergency planning and response
June 1, 2010
Emergency Response in the BP oil rig fire - Shades of Piper Alpha?
A detailed article in the Wall Street Journal about the lack of command and control system after the BP oil rig fire eerily brings back memories of the lack of emergency response after Piper Alpha disaster in 1988. In the BP oil rig fire emergency response, the article mentions the following points:
"The chain of command broke down at times during the crisis, according to many crew members. They report that there was disarray on the bridge and pandemonium in the lifeboat area, where some people jumped overboard and others called for boats to be launched only partially filled.
The vessel's written safety procedures appear to have made it difficult to respond swiftly to a disaster that escalated at the speed of the events on April 20. For example, the guidelines require that a rig worker attempting to contain a gas emergency had to call two senior rig officials before deciding what to do. One of them was in the shower during the critical minutes, according to several crew members.
The written procedures required multiple people to jointly make decisions about how to respond to "dangerous" levels of gas—a term that wasn't precisely defined—and some members of the crew were unclear about who had authority to initiate an emergency shutdown of the well".
We seem to not learn from previous disasters like Piper Alpha where similar confusion existed after the fire!
Read the full article in this link.
"The chain of command broke down at times during the crisis, according to many crew members. They report that there was disarray on the bridge and pandemonium in the lifeboat area, where some people jumped overboard and others called for boats to be launched only partially filled.
The vessel's written safety procedures appear to have made it difficult to respond swiftly to a disaster that escalated at the speed of the events on April 20. For example, the guidelines require that a rig worker attempting to contain a gas emergency had to call two senior rig officials before deciding what to do. One of them was in the shower during the critical minutes, according to several crew members.
The written procedures required multiple people to jointly make decisions about how to respond to "dangerous" levels of gas—a term that wasn't precisely defined—and some members of the crew were unclear about who had authority to initiate an emergency shutdown of the well".
We seem to not learn from previous disasters like Piper Alpha where similar confusion existed after the fire!
Read the full article in this link.
Labels:
Emergency planning and response
Fire in Chemical Factory
This youtube video shows a fire in a chemical plant in Andhra Pradesh. The official says that the plant was not in operation since 2006 and did not have permission to operate. But when you see the fire it appears that large quantities of flammable chemicals were stored in vessels that were very close to each other. See the video in this link.